Carey Corporation
Rogue Outdoor Store
Warning conference Revocation warrantedThis gun dealer was cited for 11 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
Address
29865 Ellensburg Avenue
Gold Beach, OR 97444
Curry County
License
Number | 9-93-015-01-7E-01183 |
Type | Dealer in firearms |
Expiry | May 1, 2023 |
Inspection Timeline
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 219 hours conducting this inspection. 145 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
CONDUCT FULL THEFT/LOSS INSPECTION. THEFT redactedANDGUNS ON 7/29/15 WAS DISCLOSED TO ATF ON 6/8/16. SEE ATTACHED GOLD BEACH PD INCIDENT NUMBER redacted INFORMATION FROM PD INDICATES THAT FFL MAY HAVE HAD ADD'L THEFTS UNREPORTED TO ATF. VERIFY AND ENSURE THAT ALL STOLEN/MISSING FIREARMS ARE PROPERLY REPORTED. EUGENE SATELLITE OFFICE HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE THEFT AND PROVIDED A COPY OF THE POLICE REPORT.
IOI redacted recommends revocation of the Federal firearms license due to the following violation of the Gun Control Act : 27 CFR 478.99(c) - I redacted instances the licensee transferred a firearm to a prohibited person despite the transferee/buyer indicating they are prohibited by checking "Yes" question 11i (Have you ever been convicted in any court of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence?).
The Inspection disclosed a violation that warrants revocation. Specifically, redacted occasions the licensee transferred a firearm to a purchaser who had answered “Yes” in response to Item 11i of ATF Form 4473 regarding prior misdemeanor crime of domestic violence conviction. A CCH check on the purchaser disclosed that he was prohibited based on a 2001 domestic violence conviction. A/S redacted recommends an alternate recommendation of DIO Warning Conference based on the following considerations: the NICS background check on the prohibited purchaser was approved. Contact with FBI NICS disclosed that FBI NICS will not issue a denial because the conviction document does not specify the specific subsection of the Oregon Assault IV statute that the purchaser plead guilty to. However, Seattle FD Counsel and the AUSA consider the conviction to be a prohibitor. After the inspection, the licensee bought the firearms back from the purchaser. The current inspection is the first compliance inspection conducted since the license was issued in 2005. The licensee stated that the firearm was transferred based on the background check approval, which caused the licensee to believe that the transfer was lawful. The licensee stated its understanding that a “Yes” answer to a proh biting question on the ATF Form 4473 should result in the transaction being stopped in all future transactions. Based on the licensee’s stated understanding and intent to avoid a repeat violation, it appears that the licensee can be brought into voluntary compliance. Alternate recommendation forwarded to DIO for review and concurrence.
Concurrance with alternative recommendation to DIO Warning Coference in lieu of Revocation. First inspection since license issued in 2005. redacted instance of transfering to a prohibited person (whose NICS background received an "approved"). FFL acknowledged mistake and willing to make currection in future transactions to elminiate prohibited distributions.
Violations
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 11 violations.
Citation | Description | |
---|---|---|
478.125(e) | Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗 | |
478.102(a)(1) | Failure to contact NICS before completing a firearm transfer. 🔗 | |
478.39a | Failure to appropriately report the theft or loss of a firearm from a licensee's inventory. 🔗 | |
478.21(a) | Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗 | |
478.124(c)(1) | Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗 | |
478.124(c)(3)(iv) | Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗 | |
478.124(a) | Failure to record the transfer of a firearm on a Form 4473. 🔗 | |
478.102(c) | Failure to initiate a new background check after more than 30 days have elapsed from the initial check. 🔗 | |
478.99(c) | Sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person. 🔗 | |
478.126a | Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗 | |
478.124(c)(5) | Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗 |
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »