Conduct a full-scope compliance inspection.

A Warning Letter with No Recall Inspection is recommended as an alternate recommendation in lieu of a Warning Conference. Current inspection results disclosed two violations. The violations disclosed during the inspection were: 1.) redacted dispositions not recorded but reconciled 2.) redacted instance for failure to conduct a required NICS check or obtain a valid exemption to the NICS check prior to transferring a firearm. The instances of Violation #1, which warrants a Warning Conference, was redacted instances of not recording a disposition in the A&D record (Which calculated to a 10.3% error rate). Although this violation ha^Seen cited in a past in an inspection (ten years ago) in 2006, redacted untimely disposition A&D instances. Less than 1%), a recall inspection conducted in 2008 yielded no violations. The violation appears to be the result of oversight, rather than willful disregard for recordkeeping requirements. All firearms were accounted for with ATF F 4473s or police reports. Mr. Smith stated he was sure that he had entered the information in the computer system for the firearms that were seized by the police departments. Mr. Smith felt as though it may be “a glitch in the system”. Violation, #2, would result in a recommendation of Report of Violations only. None of the violations disclosed would pose a significant risk to public safety. Show more