Davis, Raymond Louis
Evergreen PawnWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun pawnbroker was cited for 11 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
|Type||Pawnbroker in firearms|
|Expiry||Aug 1, 2021|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 35.5 hours conducting this inspection. 102 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
The inspection should be conducted in accordance with the "Firearms Disposition Emphasis Inspection Quick Reference Guide” and the Industry Operations Coding Guidelines.
he Federal Licensing System (FLS) should be updated with the following information: ¿ The licensee’s email address is email@example.com.
Name: Raymond Louis Davis d/b/a Evergreen Pawn Type: Firearms Compliance Inspection (Type 02) 1 -58-00197 Lead Investigator: redacted Recommendation: Viols and Revocation/Denial of Renewal App Basis for Recommendation: The field investigation disclosed a total of 11 violations, two of which warrant revocation in accordance with the Administrative Action Policy. The licensee transferred a firearm to a prohibited person knowing or having reason to believe that the transferee is a prohibited person when the purchaser answered yes to 11c "Have you ever been convicted in any court for a felony..." in violation of 27 CFR 478.99(c)(1). Additionally, the licensee knowingly engaged in a straw purchase transaction as the licensee knew or had reasonable cause to believe that the purchaser of record was not the actual buyer when a different individual was allowed to redeem a firearm from pawn after the original person who pawned the firearm was denied. Emailed DIO Diana Mitchell and Acting DIO Paulean Wooley on 8/25/2015. The Monitored Case Briefing-Initial Submission will be emailed to the DIO and Acting DIO under separate email on 8/25/2015.
Two violations warrant revocation due to the FFL 's failure to prevent the transfer of a firearm to a purchaser who answered yes to prohibiting question 11 c on the ATF Form 4473 in violation of 27 CFR 478.99(c)(1); and appeared to be involved in a straw purchase of a pawned firearm in which the initial transfer was denied to the original pawn ticket holder, in violation of 27 CFR 478.21 a. In light of these violations, a DIO held WC ILO Revocation is recommended as the purchaser had a valid Georgia state permit, which resulted in the FFL not conducting a background check to reveal that he was prohibited. The FFL's response to the straw purchase was that they thought the transfer could be made to the person in possession of the pawn ticket. As this is the FFL second compliance investigation, it is believed that a warning conference would serve best to reiterate the seriousness of the violations and to further educate the FFL on the proper manner to handle transactions in the future.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 11 violations.
|1||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|2||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|3||478.99(c)(1)||Sale or delivery of a firearm or ammunition to a person who is under indictment for or has been convicted of a crime punishable by a prison term greater than one year. 🔗|
|4||478.99(c)(5)||Sale or delivery of a firearm or ammunition to a person who is an alien illegally in the United States. 🔗|
|5||478.102(a)(2)(ii)||Transferring a firearm before three business days have elapsed from the date that the licensee contacted NICS. 🔗|
|6||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|7||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|8||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|9||478.124(c)(4)||Failure to record on Form 4473 the manufacturer, importer, type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of the firearm being transferred. 🔗|
|10||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|11||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »