Dublin Pawn LLC
E S Ramey FirearmsWarning letter
This gun manufacturer was cited for 7 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Manufacturer of firearms|
|Expiry||May 1, 2023|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 139.5 hours conducting this inspection. 108 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
pis conduct full renew — expires 5/1/17
ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION : Warning Letter, Report of Violations, No Further Action. The ATF adverse action policy states that a Warning Conference is advised when a manufacturer fails to properly mark firearms. The licensee failed to timely mark redacted firearms with the manufacturer name, and city and state. IOI redacted recommends a Warning Letter in lieu of a Warning Conference, for the following reasons: - it is the licensee’s first compliance inspection, - no other violations found during the inspection call for a Warning Letter or Warning Conference, - the licensee was educated on what they are required to mark on the firearms, - the licensee immediately marked the firearms properly once they were directed to do so.
Area Supervisor concurs with IOI ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION of Warning Letter and no recall , instead of a Warning Conference. The ATF adverse action policy states that a Warning Conference is advised when a manufacturer fails to properly mark firearms. The licensee failed to timely mark redacted firearms with the manufacturer name, and city and state. This issue was corrected immediately after it was discovered by IOI redacted. There were no missing firearms discovered during this inspection. This is the first inspection for this type 07 FFL . They are also a fairly large volume (approx redacted dispositions a year) dealer, whose error rates on this inspection ( A&D and 4473 's) were less than 1%. None of the other violations (besides the redacted unmarked firearms) found during this inspection would call for a Warning Letter. IOl redacted spent time educating the FFL on the requirements of marking firearms and she believes this error will not be made again. Due to the factors listed above, Area Supervisor concurs with Alternate Recommendation of Warning Letter and no recall. This recommendation will be forwarded to DIO for his recommendation. DIO concurred with Warning Letter Recommendation. Warning letter sent on 1-29-2016. No further field action required.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 7 violations.
|1||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|4||478.92(a)(1)(ii)(C)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with its name and the name of the foreign manufacturer if applicable. 🔗|
|5||478.92(a)(1)(ii)(D)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with the city and state where the manufacturer is located. 🔗|
|6||478.123(a)||Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of firearms manufactured or acquired. 🔗|
|7||478.123(d)||Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of dispositions to non-licensees. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »