Favre, Tyrrell J
Favre Guns SalesWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun pawnbroker was cited for 3 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Pawnbroker in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 89 hours conducting this inspection. 352 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Warning Conference conducted in FY 2013. Conduct Recall DE inspection no later than 8/5/2013.
Application for Amended Federal Firearms License was reviewed with license. Recommend approval of amended application.
Application to Amend FFL is approved. PII approving address change sent 8/10/2015. Initial PII sent 9/21/2015. IOI redacted recommendation was part of her OJT program. Upon further review of notes taken by IOI redacted after the original report submission, a straw purchase was identified and upon confirmation the denied buyer's status, a referral was generated (2015 0011). Assignment was re-opened on 9/23/2015 with IOI redacted as lead. RECOMMENDATION: DIO WC IN LIEU OF REVOCATION The inspection meets the standard for Revocation under the Adverse Action Policy. Upon a secondary review of the investigators' worknotes, it was determined the licensee conducted a straw purchase transaction – Section 6.a.4(a). Buyer redacted was denied on 6/16/2013. On 6/22/2013 (6 days later), the same firearm was transferred to redacted, who listed the identical address redacted listed on his form. A subsequent background check shows that redacted is a convicted felon. A referral has been generated to ATF-KCFD FIG. Additional Form 4473 violations were cited for failure to properly identify the transferee on redacted and failure to properly document NICS information on redacted forms. Although both violations are repeat in nature, they do not rise to the level of adverse action. JUSTIFICATION FOR ALTERNATE : The current inspection is a recall . It stems from a August 2013 inspection that resulted in a Warning Conference conducted in October 2013. The straw purchase occurred on in June 2013, which fell within the scope of the previous inspection but was not identified. The license was issued in 2012. The licensee has amended the FFL redacted for address changes (2013 and 2015). The licensee operates a storefront business and acquired/disposed of redacted firearms respectively in the previous 12 months. The licensee had redacted firearms in inventory and redacted Forms 4473 on file for the previous year. 9/29/2015: Sent to DIO for review 9/29/2015 DIO concurs with alternate 10/5/2015: WC scheduled for 10/22/2015 @ 2pm 10/5/2015: WC Invite Letter sent 10/22/2015: DIO-WC Held 10/23/2015: Post-WC Letter sent Recall Staged
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 3 violations.
|1||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|3||478.128(c)||False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »