Gander Mountain Company
Gander Mountain #321Warning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 7 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 251 hours conducting this inspection. 114 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Concduct a DE inspection per the IOM.
On February 2. 2016 Industry Operations Investigator ( IOI ) redacted conducted a Federal Firearms License compliance inspection of Gander Mountain Company d/b/a Gander Mountain #321 Special instructions stated “ Disposition emphasis ”. IOI redacted interviewed responsible person , Store Manager-Travis Michael McMasters redacted DOB redacted exp. redacted at the licensed premises located at 1523 Vann Drive in Jackson, TN. Stated hours of operation for selling firearms are Sunday 9am-8pm, Monday -Friday 9am-9:30pm, and Saturday 8am-9:30pm. The period of inspection was from February 2, 2015 to February 2, 2016. Conclusion of the inspection was on February 18, 2016.
Case forwarded to DIO for approval of an alternate recommendation of WL with recall in lieu of WC . FFL 's first inspection since issuance of the license in 2007. Investigation disclosed 7 violations of which 1 violations redacted unreported multiple sales ) rise to the level of a WC.
The DIO has reviewed the report and supporting documentation for this case and he concurs with the alternate recommendation of warning and recall inspection in lieu of warning conference. Reasons for the alternate recommendation include the fact that this is the licensee's first compliance inspection and only one of the violations redacted unreported multiple sales ) rises to the level of a warning conference. It appears as though this licensee will correct all violations cited by renting better internal controls.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 7 violations.
|1||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|6||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|7||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »