Irunguns LLCWarning letter
This gun importer was cited for 5 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Importer of firearms|
|Expiry||Sep 1, 2021|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 69.5 hours conducting this inspection. 203 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Conduct a full scope SWB - DE (Importer) compliance inspection while evaluating for trafficking indicators; Assure compliance with current provisions of GCA / NFA . Retain hardcopies of issued ROV (if any) and/or Ack of Regs for file retention.
Field inspection performed 01/28-03/03/16; the licensee was issued a ROV for two low-volume recordkeeping violations, two conduct of business violations and a redacted violation. Although the licensee's failure to sufficiently mark a single imported firearm merits a Warning Conference by policy, it is alternatively recommended that the licensee receive the Warning Letter and Recall inspection for the following reasons: (1.) the firearm was not wholly absent of import markings: the licensee attempted to mark the firearm (unsuccessfully, as the marks were very shallow/faint) and never reattempted to fix the markings to meet required depth and height, for assured legibility; (2.) the firearm never left inventory and was immediately/completely marked as a result of the inspection; (3.) the discrepancy-rate fo redacted firearm equates to 5.2% for the guns imported during the 12 month inspection period and 0.05% of licensee's overall acquisition activity for the same period; and (4.) the licensee's absence of any compliance history. With DIO concurrence, a Warning Letter was generated and sent to the licensee (via certified post with return receipt) on 5/9/16; a Recall inspection was staged for compliance reassessment that same day. Nor further field action required.
I concur with the Area Supervsior's alternate recommendation of Warning Letter and Recall inspection .
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 5 violations.
|1||478.122(a)||Failure by an importer to maintain an accurate acquisition record. 🔗|
|2||478.122(d)||Failure by an importer to maintain an accurate record of dispositions to non-licensees. 🔗|
|4||478.92(a)(1)(ii)(C)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with its name and the name of the foreign manufacturer if applicable. 🔗|
|5||478.92(a)(1)(ii)(E)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark the frame, receiver, or barrel of imported firearms with the manufacturer's country and the importer's city and state. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »