Field inspection performed 01/28-03/03/16; the licensee was issued a ROV for two low-volume recordkeeping violations, two conduct of business violations and a redacted violation. Although the licensee's failure to sufficiently mark a single imported firearm merits a Warning Conference by policy, it is alternatively recommended that the licensee receive the Warning Letter and Recall inspection for the following reasons: (1.) the firearm was not wholly absent of import markings: the licensee attempted to mark the firearm (unsuccessfully, as the marks were very shallow/faint) and never reattempted to fix the markings to meet required depth and height, for assured legibility; (2.) the firearm never left inventory and was immediately/completely marked as a result of the inspection; (3.) the discrepancy-rate fo redacted firearm equates to 5.2% for the guns imported during the 12 month inspection period and 0.05% of licensee's overall acquisition activity for the same period; and (4.) the licensee's absence of any compliance history. With DIO concurrence, a Warning Letter was generated and sent to the licensee (via certified post with return receipt) on 5/9/16; a Recall inspection was staged for compliance reassessment that same day. Nor further field action required. Show more