Jeffrey Brian Hewitt
4J Sales
Warning letterThis gun manufacturer was cited for 3 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
Address
7925 East Crooked Creek Trail
Prescott Valley, AZ 86314
Yavapai County
License
| Number | 9-86-025-07-7K-05092 |
| Type | Manufacturer of firearms |
| Expiry | License inactive |
Inspection Timeline
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 21.5 hours conducting this inspection. 123 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Conduct a full scope SWB - DE (Manufacturer) compliance inspection while evaluating for trafficking indicators; Assure compliance with current provisions of GCA . *NOTE: Retain hardcopies of issued ROV (if any) and/or Ack of Regs for file retention.
Field inspection performed 02/06-02/07/17; the licensee was issued a ROV for two conduct of business violations and a single recordkeeping/reporting violation. Although the licensee's failure to mark (with licensee name, city & state redacted firearms after assembly merits a Warning Conference by policy, it is alternatively recommended that the licensee receive the Warning Letter and Recall inspection for the following reasons: (1.) firearm traceability has not been wholly impeded as the firearms were assembled from already marked ( GCA -compliant) lower receivers; and (2.) the licensee’s absence of any compliance history. With DIO concurrence, a Warning Letter was generated and sent to the licensee (via certified post with return receipt) on 05/04/17, a Recall Inspection was also staged for compliance reassessment. No further action required at this time.
Based on the licensee’s compliance history and minimal number of firearms manufactured (from property marked receivers), I concur with the Area Supervisor's alternate recommendation of Warning Letter only and Recall inspection .
Violations
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 3 violations.
| Citation | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| 478.123(a) | Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of firearms manufactured or acquired. 🔗 | |
| 478.92(a)(1)(ii)(C) | Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with its name and the name of the foreign manufacturer if applicable. 🔗 | |
| 478.92(a)(1)(ii)(D) | Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with the city and state where the manufacturer is located. 🔗 |
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »