J&J Hardware, LLCWarning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 5 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Jul 1, 2023|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 22 hours conducting this inspection. 133 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Compliance. Kansas Priority 3.
Violations #1 & 2 meet the criteria for a WARNING LETTER to be issued, under paragraphs 6.c.(1); 6.c.(2) and 6.c.(3) of the current ATF Adverse Action Policy.
ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION : WARNING LETTER - NO RECALL The inspection meets the standard for Warning Conference under the Administrative Action Policy (2/8/2013). The licensee was cited for failing to obtain complete certification information in Section A on redacted S Forms 4473 (20%) - Warning Conference at Sec. 6d.(3); and for redacted instances each of failing to timely/accurately record acquisition and disposition information in the A&D record (10% and 11%, respectively) - Warning Letter Sec 6.c.(1) & (2). Additional form violations do not rise to the level of administrative action. Letter JUSTIFICATION FOR ALTNERATE: The violations do not appear to meet the standard of willfulness nor did they directly affect public safety. This was the licensee's first inspection since obtaining the FFL in 2011. The licensee is a low-volume dealer that acquires/disposes of less than 25 firearms annually. No losses or traces were reported. Licensee explained that a long-time employee respons ble for the firearms portion of the business had left employment and new employees had yet to be properly trained. The licensee acknowledged the errors and was receptive to the corrective action. Based on the licensee's activity level, a recall inspection is not warranted. The licensee will be inspected on a 5-year cycle. AS Reviewed: 2/13/17 Sent to DIO : 2/13/17 DIO Concurs: 2/13/17 Warning Letter Sent: 2/13/17 Pll sent 2/13/17
Concur with alternate for warning letter
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 5 violations.
|1||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(4)||Failure to record on Form 4473 the manufacturer, importer, type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of the firearm being transferred. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|5||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »