Lesa Wilma Hoover
One Onyx One FirearmWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun dealer was cited for 10 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 72 hours conducting this inspection. 134 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Conduct a full scope SWB - DE compliance inspection while evaluating for trafficking indicators; Assure compliance with current provisions of GCA . *NOTE: Demand Letter 3 has been issued to licensee. Retain hardcopies of issued ROV (if any) and/or Ack of Regs for file retention.
A field inspection performed 04/05-04/20/16; a ROV was issued for a single (repeat) administrative violation, a single licensing violation and eight recordkeeping/reporting violations (three of which are repeat violations). Revocation of this license is specifically merited as a result of the licensee making false statement/representation on a Form 4473 when transferring a firearm to a person who appeared to be prohibited. Further, the licensee repeatedly failed to redacted multi-handgun sales, as well redacted SWB multi-rifle sales, when legally required to do so, which merits a Warning Conference.
The licensee was subject to a full scope compliance inspection April 5, 2016 through April 20, 2016. As a result of the inspection the licensee was cited redacted violations redacted of which are repeat violations. Of redacted violations redacted merits a Warning Conference (failure to complete and submit redacted multiple sales ), redacted merits Revocation. Specifically, the licensee was cited for 27 CFR 478.128(c) - the licensee knowingly made a false statement on one ATF Form 4473 when transferring a firearm. The licensee transferred a firearm having reasonable cause to believe the transferee was NOT the actual purchaser of the firearm. The licensee has never been cited for this violation during previous inspections. Additionally, since obtaining the license in 2010, the licensee has been subject to redacted. Although there is evidence that the licensee knew the transferee was not the actual purchaser of the firearm, because neither the transferee nor the intended recipient are actually prohibited from possessing or receiving firearms, I am proposing an alternate recommendation of DIO led Warning Conference in lieu of Revocation. Counsel reviewed and concurred on August 8, 2016. SAC briefed and concurred on August 15, 2016. DIO Warning Conference held on September 12, 2016. Post DIO WC Letter sent to the licensee on September 13,2016.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 10 violations.
|1||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|2||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|3||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(3)(iii)||Failure to obtain required documentation showing an exception to the prohibition on transfers to nonimmigrant aliens. 🔗|
|5||478.131(a)(2)||Failure to retain a copy of a purchaser's permit or license for a background check-exempt transaction. 🔗|
|6||478.124(c)(4)||Failure to record on Form 4473 the manufacturer, importer, type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of the firearm being transferred. 🔗|
|7||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|8||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|9||18 USC 923(g)(5)(A)||Failure to submit record information required by the Attorney General. (This citation is often used to enforce the requirement for licensees in Southwest border states to report multiple sales of semi-automatic rifles.) 🔗|
|10||478.128(c)||False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »