Conduct compliance inspection in accordance with current guidelines. *** Please check for possible hidden ownership.

This was the first compliance inspection conducted under this FFL which was issued In October of 2010. A total of 6 violations were cited during this inspection. The following violations warrant Administrative Action according to ATF O 5370.1B: 1.27 CFR 478.124(a)-The licensee failed to execute an ATF Form 4473 prior to the transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee in redacted instance. 2. 27 CFR 478.125(e)-The licensee failed to create and maintain an accurate and complete record of Acquisition & Disposition in redacted instances. Regarding Violation #1: According to ATF O 5370.1 B this violation would warrant a Warning Conference. The licensee personally knew the transferee and a background check conducted by Investigator redacted within 7 days of the transfer did not reflect any prohibiting information. According to the licensee's response to the violation, the transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee without completion of ATF Form 4473 was not intentional and occurred because both Mr. & Mrs. Wallace assisted the customer during the sale and each thought that the other person had completed the paperwork. Regarding Violation #2: According to ATF O 5370.1 B this violation would warrant a Warning Letter. During the inspection period the licensee acquired approximately redacted firearms and disposed of approximately redacted firearms. Of the redacted instances cited, redacted firearm disposition was not recorded (same transaction as Violation #1 above) and Investigator redacted verified the disposition when the customer returned to the store with the firearm for inspection. Of the redacted instances cited, redacted consisted of the licensee failing to record a disposition date when logging firearms out which represents an error rate of 7.4%. The licensee completed corrective action during the inspection by obtaining the disposition dates from ATF Forms 4473 and copying the information to the A&D record. According to ATF O 5370.1 B, the licensee would be subject to attending a Warning Conference with a Warning Letter issued and Recall Inspection . For 5 of the 6 violations cited during the inspection redacted or less instances were cited and only 2 of the 6 violations cited rose to a level warranting any Administrative Action. In light of the considerations noted above, Investigator redacted alternatively recommends a Warning Letter Only without a Recall Inspection. Show more

This was the first compliance inspection conducted under this FFL which was issued In October of 2010. A total of 6 violations were cited during this inspection. The following violations warrant Administrative Action according to ATF O 5370.1B: 1.27 CFR 478.124(a)-The licensee failed to execute an ATF Form 4473 prior to the transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee in redacted instance 2.27 CFR 478.125(e)-The licensee failed to create and maintain an accurate and complete record of Acquisition & Disposition in redacted instances. Regarding Violation #1: According to ATF O 5370.1B this violation would warrant a Warning Conference. The licensee personally knew the transferee and a background check conducted by Investigator redacted within 7 days of the transfer did not reflect any prohibiting information. According to the licensee's response to the violation, the transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee without completion of ATF Form 4473 was not intentional and occurred because both Mr. & Mrs. Wallace assisted the customer during the sale and each thought that the other person had completed the paperwork. Regarding Violation #2: According to ATF O 5370.1 B this violation would warrant a Warning Letter. During the inspection period the licensee acquired approximately 153 firearms and disposed of approximately 149 firearms. Of the redacted instances cited, redacted firearm disposition was not recorded (same transaction as Violation #1 above) and Investigator redacted verified the disposition when the customer returned to the store with the firearm for inspection. Of the redacted instances cited, redacted consisted of the licensee failing to record a disposition date when logging firearms out which represents an error rate of 7.4%. The licensee completed corrective action during the inspection by obtaining the disposition dates from ATF Forms 4473 and copying the information to the A&D record. According to ATF O 5370.1 B, the licensee would be subject to attending a Warning Conference with a Warning Letter issued and Recall Inspection . For 5 of the 6 violations cited during the inspection redacted or less instances were cited and only 2 of the 6 violations cited rose to a level warranting any Administrative Action. In light of the considerations noted above, Investigator redacted alternatively recommends a Warning Letter Only without a Recall Inspection. Following the review of the inspection report, I concurr with the recommendation of lOI redacted for a Warning Letter Only with no Recall Inspection. This was the first compliance inspection since the issuance of the license to the FFL. The firearm that was transferred without completing the ATF Form 4473 occurred when the licensee's assumed that the other manager and responsible person had completed the form. During the inspection the transferee returned to the FFL with the firearm and a subsequent background check determined the transferee was not a prohibited person. Show more