As a result of a compliance inspection conducted in March 2014, a WL was sent. Conduct a full recall compliance inspection.

IOI redacted recommends revocation of Federal Firearms License due to repeated violations of 27 CFR 478.21(a), 27 CFR 478.124(c)(1) 27 CFR 478.124(c)(3)(iv), 27 CFR 478.126a, and 27 CFR 478.125(e). The licensee willfully attempted to falsify ATF Form 3310.11 - Federal Firearms Licensee Firearms Inventory Theft/Loss Report in an attempt to avoid being cited by ATF during a compliance inspection. Show more

As a result of the compliance inspection, the licensee was cited for failure to ensure that the Forms 4473 were completed correctly and completely redacted instances (Items 2, 3, 13 and 17 were left blank or were incorrect) - repeat violation from the 2014, 2012, 2010 and 2008 inspections; failure to ensure that all NICS information was recorded on the Forms 4473 as required redacted instances - repeat of the 2014, 2012, 2010, 2008, 2007 inspections; failure to report the multiple sale of handguns redacted instances - repeat of the 2008 inspection; failure to report the multiple sale of long guns redacted instance; failure to record, and/or correctly record the required information in the A/D recor redacted instances (3 firearms were reports as lost redacted) - repeat of the 2014, 2010, 2008 and 2007 inspections. For the 2015 compliance inspection, the licensee was reluctant to allow the IOIs entrance to conduct the inspection but was eventually persuaded. The licensee also completed a theft/loss report for redactedfirearms stating stating that he had submitted it without verifying that all the firearms were in inventory. The FFL stated that he had filed the report because he knew that ATF was going to be conducting an inspection and didn't want to get in trouble for not filing it. It was later revealed that the theft/loss report had not been submitted. After the inventory reconciliation conducted by the IOIs, the FFL was advised to submit the amended theft / loss report (down redacted firearms) but did not do so. The report was filed by the IOI . When that report was later amended, the FFL did not file that amended report (down redacted firearms) when instructed to do so. That amended theft/loss report was also filed by the IOI. The FFL had a personal firearms inventory of approximately redacted firearms. The FFL displays his personal firearms along with his inventory firearms when he attends guns shows. The FFL has been advised and acknowledged that his employee redacted is a prohibited person and is not allowed access to firearms. redacted was assisting the FFL with the loading and unloading of firearms at the licensed premise before and after every gun show. The Lisles are sympathetic of redacted and believes redacted when he states that he is not prohibited. Numberous recent traces have been traced back to the FFLs personal collection. Although very few recent firearms acquired are reflected in the A/D record as being transferred to his personal collection, Mr. Lisle was transferring firearms ordered with his FFL directly into his personal collection prior to the 2014 inspection. As a result of inspection conducted in 2015 (3), 2014 (4), 2010 (2), and 2008 (7) firearms were reported as lost/missing. For the 2014 and 2015, the lost of firearms was discovered after the FFL's participation at a gun show . (reference narrative). Previous inspection resulted in a WL (2014, 2007), WC (2010 and 2008) ROV (2012, 1995 and 1992). The licensee received his FFL in 1964 and the first compliance inspection was conducted in 1992. During the inspection period, the licensee acquired redacted firearms, disposed ofredacted firearms, redacted completed forms on file. There were approximately redacted traced to the licensee during the inspection period and redacted traces were not completed. There were redacted firearms in the business inventory. One referral was generated and submitted to ABQ CE. Show more