Magfussion Enterprises LLC
MR SilencerWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun manufacturer was cited for 9 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
|Type||Manufacturer of firearms|
|Expiry||Apr 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 122.5 hours conducting this inspection. 138 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
SWB - MFG/IMP PROGRAM. Conduct a full SWB DE compliance inspection in accordance with current FY IO Operating Plan. 12 months records review of ATF Forms 4473 and 100% inventory reconciliation is required. Ensure all license specific required documentation is completed and up to date.
The licensee was subject to a full scope compliance inspection May 18, 2016 through July 6, 2016. As a result of the inspection the licensee was cited for nine violations, one of which is a repeat violation. Of the nine violations, one merits Revocation. Specifically, the licensee was cited for 27 CFR 478.128(c) - The licensee knowing made false statements and/or representation with res he information required by the provisions of the Gun Control Act by recording false information into the A&D Record. The licensee recorded redacted uppressors into the A&D Record as acquisitions without actually receiving them. Of the other eight violations, three merit a Warning Conference, one merits a Warning Letter, and the other four merit a ROV only. There were no firearms reported missing. The licensee has never been previously cited for violating 27 CFR 478.128(c). The licensee has only been subject to one previous compliance inspection which resulted in a ROV only. Therefore, I am making an alternate recommendation of DIO Led Warning Conference in lieu of Revocation. DIO Warning Conference was held with the licensee on October 20, 2016. Post DIO Warning Conference Letter was sent to the licensee on November 8, 2016.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 9 violations.
|1||478.123(a)||Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of firearms manufactured or acquired. 🔗|
|2||478.123(b)||Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of dispositions to other licensees. 🔗|
|3||478.123(d)||Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of dispositions to non-licensees. 🔗|
|4||478.128(c)||False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|6||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|7||478.124(a)||Failure to record the transfer of a firearm on a Form 4473. 🔗|
|8||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|9||479.102(a)(2)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer of NFA firearms to mark frames or receivers with information including the model, caliber, and the manufacturer and/or importer's name and location. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »