Matthew Lee Vance
Advanced EnterprisesWarning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 1 violation. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 25 hours conducting this inspection. 36 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
pis conduct a DE inspection - expires 12/1/17
Investigator redacted disclosed one (1) violation during this field inspection. An ATF Form 5030.5, Report of Violations, was prepared and issued to the licensee. The violation was a violation for failing to complete and submit the ATF multiple sale of handguns/pistols form on redacted occasions involving redacted firearms. Due to the number of times the violation occurred a Warning Letter and Warning Conference would normally be recommended. However due to the FFL 's claim he was unaware of the requirement, his apparent shock over learning of this requirement and his quick response to fill out and send in the required documentation, it is IOI redacted's opinion that a Warning Letter would suffice in this particular case.
Compliance Inspection conducted by redacted at the business premises of Matthew Vance on 11-9-16. Investigator redacted disclosed one (1) violation during this field inspection. This is the first field inspection of this FFL since an application inspection. One violation was found during inspection for failing to complete and submit the ATF multiple sale of handguns/pistols form on redacted occasions involving redacted firearms. The adverse action policy suggests that a warning conference be held whenever an FFL fails to report 5 or more multiple sales, however the Area Supervisor believes that since this is the first inspection and the IOI has now educated the FFL on this requirement, it is believed that this violation will not occur again. These redacted unreported multiple sales were reported immediately with the help of IOI redacted. Due to these reasons, the Area Supervisor recommends a Warning Letter and no recall
DIO concurs with the Lead IOI and Area Supervisors recommendation of a warning letter and no recall inspection , in lieu of a warning conference. The FFL failed to report redacted multiple sales of firearms during the review period, which constitutes a warning conference per the Firearms Adverse Action Policy and Procedures. This was the only violation disclosed during the licensees first compliance inspection. The Lead IOI thoroughly educated the FFL regarding the multiple sale of handguns requirement. It is also noted that the FFL property accounted for their firearms inventory and did not have any firearms trace issues.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 1 violation.
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »