111 Gun ShopRevocation/denial of renewal
This gun dealer was cited for 12 violations. The inspection resulted in revocation/denial of renewal.
A final disposition of revocation/denial of renewal means that ATF officials concluded the dealer must lose its license. This requires a determination that the licensee wilfully violated regulations or is otherwise ineligible to remain in business. The licensee will either have their license revoked after a specified period of time, or be unable to renew their license once it expires.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 373 hours conducting this inspection. 240 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of revocation/denial of renewal.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
W/C held on 10/14/14. Recall Ul opened 02/16/2016. Conduct a full recall inspection by the end of FY 2016.
On 8/16/2016, Senior Industry Operations Investigator redacted commenced a compliance inspection at the business premises of MAVF, LLC d/b/a 111 Gun Shop. See narrative report for full details. Licensee was cited with 12 violations of the Gun Control Act , all of which were repeat violations that would require a warning conference. The licensee has been the subject redacted IO led warning conferences (2012 and 2014), and compliance is still lacking. Such continued non-compliance can be construe willful violation of the Gun Control Act. Recommend revocation of the Federal firearms license.
A firearms recall inspection was completed on 9/28/2016 and resulted in a ROV for 12 violations. Revocation is recommended due to a stand-alone violation as well as repeat violations that were also cited during the 2012 and 2014 inspections. Both the 2012 and 2014 inspections resulted in an alternate recommendation of DIO warning conference in lieu of revocation. All 12 violations cited during this inspection were cited in the 2014 inspection. The stand-alone violation cited in this inspection that calls for revocation is violation #1, 27 CFR 478.99(c). Transfer of a firearm to an individual with reasonable cause to believe the individual was proh bited. this violation was also cited in the 2012 and 2014 inspection. Violation #3, 27 CFR 478.99(a) redacted stance of transferring a receiver to an out of state resident. This violation would ordinarily result in a warning conference. However, since this is a repeat violation cited in 2014 and a warning conference was held, this violation calls for revocation. Violation #4, 27 CFR 478.126a. Failure redacted stances to report a multiple sale of handguns. This violation would ordinarily result in warning conference. However, since this is a repeat violation cited in 2012 and 2014 and a warning conference was held, this violation calls for revocation. FFL Revoked 10/16/2017. Final Pll sent to the FFLC on 10/30/2017.
The licensee has been licensed since May of 2010, and at that time an Acknowledgment of Federal Regulations was completed with Ms . Shafer aka Ms. Van Fleet. (At that time she was located in Indiana, 4-35-03806) A firearms recall inspection was completed on September 28, 2016, which resulted in 12 violations. Two previous inspections, in 2012 and 2014, resulted in a recommendation of DIO warning conference in lieu of revocation. All 12 violations cited during this inspection were repeat violations from the 2014 inspection and 9 violations were multiple repeats from the 2012 inspection. The current inspection yielded a violation of 27 CFR 478.99(c). The licensee transferred of a firearm to an individual with reasonable cause to believe the individual was prohibited. This violation was also cited in the 2012 and 2014 inspections. In this case, a purchaser answered “yes” to question 11i. The purchaser asked the licensee if she could purchase a firearm with a previous criminal history. The seller stated that it would be determined by NICS . This transaction resulted in a Delay/Denial in which a Special Agent was required to retrieve the firearm that was transferred to a prohibited person. The licensee was cited for 27 CFR 478.99(a). I redacted nstance, the licensee transferred a receiver to an out of s sident. This is a repeat violation cited in 2014. The licensee failed file a Report of Multiple Sale or Other Disposition of Pistols and Revolvers i redacted instances, a violation of 27 CFR 478.126a. This is a repeat violation cited in 2012 and 2014. Additionally, on April 26, 2011, a driver drove a vehicle into 111 Gunshop’s window (at the previous location redacted s were stolen from inventory. On July 28, 2016, 111 Gunshop was again had a vehicle driven through a storefront window, resulting redacted rearms being stolen. Throughout the course of the current inspection, the licensee, including the responsible person and the employees displayed plain indifference to the requirements of the Gun Control Act . The licensee had a significant amount of violations that have been repeated multiple times. When reconciling inventory, the Responsible Person stated that some discrepancies were from the inspection conducted in 2012. The Responsible Person, as well as employees, hindered the completion of the inspection by being unavailable at times and arriving to the business premises significantly later than planned. The Store Manager, intentionally misled the lead IOI and hindered the inspection by lying about existence of firearms as well as denying access to storage rooms where the firearms were stored. The lead IOI and Area Supervisor recommend revocation. DIO concurs.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 12 violations.
|1||478.99(c)||Sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person. 🔗|
|2||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|3||478.99(a)||Sale or delivery of a firearm other than a long gun to an out-of-state resident. 🔗|
|4||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|5||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|6||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|7||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|8||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|9||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|10||478.124(c)(4)||Failure to record on Form 4473 the manufacturer, importer, type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of the firearm being transferred. 🔗|
|11||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|12||478.131(a)(2)||Failure to retain a copy of a purchaser's permit or license for a background check-exempt transaction. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »