Myers, Jeffrey Scott Sr
Reese's StoreWarning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 3 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Feb 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 378 hours conducting this inspection. 172 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
FY2017 DA MANDATORY RECALL COMPLIANCE (TYPE 01 FFL ) RESULTING FROM A DIO WC “Must Be Completed By 03/01/2017 Please conduct a full compliance Recall Inspection at the licensed premises. As part of this inspection, please conduct the following activities: Verify the business profile to ensure proper licensure -Explore ownership and control to include Deconfliction Queries -Conduct a full physical inventory in conjunction with an A&D Records Review. The inspection should focus on inventory and inventory controls as this was the licensee's primary issue during the previous Compliance Inspection. -Conduct a comprehensive review of ATF Form 4473s for the inspection period with a focus on suspicious purchasers worthy of referral to ATF CE -Ensure that all Multiple HG Sales are timely and accurately filed for the inspection period -Examine trace activity for the inspection period -Issue a ROV (if necessary) -Conduct a Federal Firearms Regulations Review with the RP -Make recommendations in accordance with the Adverse Action Plan
Ul# 766060-2017-0169-BIB FFL # 8-25-02285 Licensee: Myers, Jeffrey Scott Sr. dba Reese's Store Dates of Inspection: 01/17/2017-02/10/2017 Scope of Inspection: FY2017 Recall Compliance (Type 01 FFL) Time Frame of Inspection: 01/01/2016-12/31/2016 Recommendation: ROV Only; No Recall Lead IOI : redacted A/S Comments: From 01/17/2017-02/10/2017, IOI redacted led a team of IOIs in conducting a Recall Compliance Inspection at the licensed premises of Jeffrey Scott Myers Sr. dba Reese's Store. As a result of this inspection, the following four (4) Repeat Violations were cited: 1.) 27 CFR 478.21(a): Completion of ATF Form 4473 REPEAT OF VIOLATION CITED ON 8/3/2015 AND 12/8/2009 Nature of Violation: Failure to obtain properly completed ATF F 4473 in redacted out of 3,610 ATF Forms 4473s examined (2012 Edition). In redacted instances, Section A, Item #11a of the ATF F 4473 was answered No instead of Yes and the sale was completed. 2.) 27 CFR 478.124(c)(1) REPEAT OF VIOLATION CITED ON 8/3/2015,1/7/2013 AND 12/8/2009 Nature of Violation: Failure to obtain properly completed ATF F 4473 in redacted out of 3,610 ATF Forms 4473 examined (2012 Edition). A total of redacted instances were found where information on the ATF F 4473s was blank. The following was found: In redacted, instances, Section A, Item 11d was blank. In redacted instances, Section A, Item 11e was blank. In redacted instance, Section A, Item 11j was blank. 3.) 27 CFR 478 99(c) REPEAT OF VIOLATION CITED ON 12/8/2009 Nature of Violation: Per 27 CFR 478.99(c), the licensee transferred a firearm to a non-licensee, who at the time of the sale, appeared to be prohibited by answering “Yes” to question 11(k) in redacted instance on the ATF Form 4473 (2012 Edition). The licensee continued with the sale and subsequently transferred one firearm to the aforementioned individual. 4.) 27 CFR 478 126a REPEAT OF VIOLATION CITED ON 9/1/2015 AND 12/8/2009 Nature of Violation: The licensee failed to prepare and submit a report of multiple sales or other dispositions not later than the close of the business day that the multiple sale(s) or other disposition (s) occurred. The licensee failed to report redacted multiple sales involving redacted firearms during the previous twelve months. Based upon these violations and in accordance with the new Adverse Action Policy, IOI redacted has recommended a ROV Only with NO Recall. A/S Comments: A/S redacted concurs with the recommendation of “ROV Only; NO Recall" for the following reasons: 1.) After inventorying over 2,200 firearms and reviewing over 8,000 Acquisition and Disposition Entries, NO A&D Record Violations were cited resulting in NO missing firearms. This is a marked improvement from the previous Recall Compliance Inspection where redacted instances of an A&D Record Violation were cited resulting in redacted missing firearms. 2.) Low ATF Form 4473 Deficiency Ratings. After examining over 3,600 ATF Form 4473, the Deficiency Ratings were less than 1%. 3.) All of the purchasers who were the subjects of the ATF Form 4473 violations were run with NO prohibiting information identified. 4.) The licensee did fail to report redacted Multiple Handgun Sales involving redacted firearms; however, during the inspection period, the licensee timely and accurately reported ninety-one (91) multiple handgun sales involving one-hundred and eighty-nine (189) firearms. Of note, the redacted firearms were queried through eTrace with redacted. 5.) Improvement in Internal Controls. Licensee is utilizing a Tag System and conducting inventories of the firearms on hand. Of note, the licensee appropriately reported redacted missing/stolen firearm on 07/01/2016 after conducting a full physical inventory in June 2016. The licensee continues to exhibit sufficient internal controls involving ATF Form 4473s as evidenced by Deficiency Ratings of less than one percent (1%). Finally, the licensee has ceased purchasing used firearms in an attempt to cut down on the number of traces. 6.) No unsuccessful traces. The licensee was the subject of redacted successful traces in the last year. The licensee's average time to crime for the redacted traces was approximately redacted 7.) No suspicious purchasers/firearms identified. As previously mentioned, the licensee has ceased purchasing used firearms in order to curtail trace activity. For the above-mentioned reasons, a ROV only with NO Recall Inspection is a sufficient course of action at this time. However, the Narrative Report and all exhibits will be forwarded to the DIO for secondary review and final recommendation.
On this third Recall , Compliance Investigation three (3) Repeat Violations were found (i.e., redacted deficient Forms 4473 and redacted unreported multiple sales involving redacted HGs), which, due to the licensee's compliance history, by policy, subjects the license to revocation if willful However, in light of the Division Counsel's opinion, and considering the negligible percentage error rate relative to the business volume, no missing firearms, redacted traces, nor evidence of trafficking/ straw sales , no dispositions to prohibited individuals, or apparent threat to the public safety, a WL , no Recall, in lieu of revocation is deemed appropriate action to address the violaitons.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 3 violations.
|1||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|3||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »