Nesbit, Jeffrey R.
Nesbit GunsWarning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 8 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Jan 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 188 hours conducting this inspection. 61 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Please complete an on-site DE Compliance Inspection. As part of this inspection, please conduct a full physical inventory of the firearms on hand and a comprehensive review of the ATF Form 4473s on hand for the inspection period.
Ul# 766060-2016-0447-BIB FFL # 8-25-03313 Licensee: Nesbit, Jeffrey Richard dba Nesbit Guns Dates of Inspection: 08/01/2016-08/18/2016 Scope of Inspection: Type 01 FFL DE Compliance Time Frame of Inspection: 08/01/2015-08/01/2016 Lead SIOI: Assist IOI : A/S Comments: From 08/01/2016-08/18/2016, SIOI redacted and IOI redacted completed a DE Compliance Inspection at the licensed premises of Jeffrey Richard Nesbit dba Nesbit Guns. During this inspection, SIOI redacted and IOI redacted inventoried over 1,000 firearms and reviewed of 1,300 ATF Form 4473s . As a result of this inspection, SIOI redacted and IOI redacted cited the following eight (8) violations: As a result of these violations and in accordance with the Adverse Action Policy, SIOI redacted has recommended: Violations; ROV ; WL Only; No Recall . A/S Recommendation: A/S redacted concurs with SIOI redacted recommendation in part. A/S redacted concurs with the issuance of a WL for the following reasons: 1) Licensee's first Compliance Inspection since issuance of the FFL in 2009. 2). No missing/unaccounted for firearms resulted from the inspection. 3). Licensee conducted PICS background checks on all firearms transfers/sales. 4). Low Deficiency Ratings: redacted of 1,795 Acquisition Entries were incomplete/inaccurate for a .7% Deficiency Rating; redacted of 1,508 Disposition Entries were incomplete/inaccurate for a .6% Deficiency Rating redacted instances of failure to obtain valid and/or complete I.D. information resulting in a .5% Deficiency Rating. These low Deficiency Rating merit a ROV Only. 5). redacted unreported Mulitple HG Sale involving redacted firearms. This violation merits a WL per the Adverse Action Policy. It should be noted that the licensee properly and timely reported redacted Multiple HG Sales during the inspection period. 6). redacted transfer to an individual who appeared prohibited at the time of sale but ultimately was found NOT to be prohibited. Per the Adverse Action Policy, this violation merits a WL. 7). Not a significant threat to public safety. The licensee is a high volume dealer with a surprisingly low level of trace activity. The licensee has disposed of approximately 12,000 firearms since beginning business in 2009, resulting in a rate of firearms traced redacted. NO suspicious purchasers or firearms were referred to CE for further investigation. 8). Adequate internal controls for both inventory and ATF Form 4473s completion and reviews. The licensee utilizes a tag system to track inventory. Additionally, the licensee conducts an annual full physical inventory of the firearms on hand. The licensee attempts to review ATF Form 4473s twice prior to placing them to permanent file. SIOI redacted suggested that a standardized system of secondary checks be implemented in order to reduce ATF Form 4473 errors and/or omissions. For the above-mentioned reasons, a WL is the appropriate recourse at this time. However, due to the number of violations and the number of instances of each violation, a Recall Inspection is needed in order to ensure proper completion of ATF Form 4473s and the A&D Record Books. **The WL will be issued via Certified Mail on 09/12/2016
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 8 violations.
|1||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|2||478.99(c)||Sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|6||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|7||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|8||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »