Ohm, Eugene H & Ohm, Betty R.
Genes Pawn ShopWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun pawnbroker was cited for 14 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Pawnbroker in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 433.5 hours conducting this inspection. 1,715 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
"CE INVESTIGATION" RECALL - WARNING CONFERENCE - INSPECT AFTER 8/23/2012
3/31/17 - Report submitted to A/S redacted 4/6/17 - Instructed to revise report, report revised & inserted. 4/10/17 - Instruction to revise report rescinded. 4/11/17 - Minor editing done to original report, resigned & inserted. DIO WC Held 6//6/17.
SYNOPSIS OF VIOLATIONS: 1) 26 U.S.C. 586(d) - MEETS CRITERIA FOR REVOCATION 2) 18 U.S.C. 922(z) -MEETS CRITERIA FOR REVOCXATION 3) 27 CFR 478.102(a) MEETS CRITERIA FOR REVOCATION (FAILURE T OCONDUCT NICS CHECK redacted INSTANCES) REPEAT VIOLATION CITED ON 11/2/2009. 4) 27 CFR 478.99(b)(2) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. 5) 27 CFR 478.124(a) - MEETS CRITERIA FOR REVOCATION. 6) 27 CFR 478.125(e) - MEETS CRITERIA FOR REVOCATION REPEAT VIOLATION CITED ON 8/23/2011, 11/2/2009 & 10/28/2008. 7) 27 CFR 478.126a - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. 8) 27 CFR 478.124(c)(3)(i) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. 9) 27 CFR 478124(c)(1)- DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. REPEAT VIOLATION CITED ON 8/23/2011, 11/2/2009, & 10/28/2008. 10) 27 CFR 478.124(c)(3)(iv) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. REPEAT VIOLATION CITED ON 8/23/2011, 11/2/2009 & 10/28/2008. 11) 27 CFR 478.21 (a) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. REPEAT VIOLATION CITED ON 8/23/2011, 11/2/2009 & 10/28/2008. 12) 27 CFR 478.124(c)(4) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. 13) 27 CFR 478.124(c)(5) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. REPEAT VIOLATION CITED ON 8/23/2011, 14) 27 CFR 478.124(b) - DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE ACTION. AREA SUPERVISOR REVIEW: PRIOR INSPECTIONS OF THIS FFL HAS RESULTED IN A WARNING CONFERENCE HELD ON OCTOBER 12, 2011 .WITH WARNING LETTERS BEING ISSUED ON 11/25/2009 AND 11/13/2008. FFL SIGNED FORMS OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIREARMS RULES AND REGULATION ON 8/26/2011,11/10/2009 AND ON 10/30/2008. FFL'S OPERATIONS WARRANTED AN INVESTIGTATION BY CE WHICH POSTPONED AREA OFFICE RECALL INVESTIGATION. I CONCUR WITH THE IOI RECOMMENDATION FOR REVOCATION. APRIL 24, 2017 - PER DISCUSSION WITH DIO : RECOMMENDATION: DIO WARNING CONFERENCE
DIO warning conference instead of revocation. Division Counsel concurred.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 14 violations.
|1||26 USC 5861(d)||Receiving or possessing a machine gun or other restricted firearm not registered under the National Firearms Act. 🔗|
|2||18 USC 922(z)||Failure to provide a secure gun storage or safety device when selling or transferring a handgun. 🔗|
|3||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|4||478.99(b)(2)||Sale or delivery of a firearm to a person who is prohibited from possessing it under state law. 🔗|
|5||478.124(a)||Failure to record the transfer of a firearm on a Form 4473. 🔗|
|6||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|7||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|8||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|9||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|10||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|11||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|12||478.124(c)(4)||Failure to record on Form 4473 the manufacturer, importer, type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of the firearm being transferred. 🔗|
|13||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|14||478.124(b)||Failure to maintain ordered records of all Forms 4473. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »