Poindexter Bait IncWarning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 4 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Nov 1, 2021|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 37 hours conducting this inspection. 32 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Firearms recall inspection .
The licensee attended a warning conference and warning letter in 2014. This inspection disclosed four repeat violations one of which rises to the level of another warning conference (warning letter elevated to warning conference for similar violations). Investigator redacted believes that a warning conference for this FFL is inappropriate because of the total number of firearm transactions, significant improvements made by the licensee since their previous inspection, and the licensee's ability to immediately correct the violation that would result in a warning conference. For these reasons Investigator redacted is recommending a warning letter with no recall inspection .
Recall inspection disclosed redacted violations one of which warrants a warning letter; however, the licensee received a warning letter during the previous inspection warranting a warning conference for this inspection. After reviewing the assignment and discussion with the Senior IOI , I concur with his recommendation that a warning letter without recall be the end result of this inspection. As the IOI indicates: a warning conference for this FFL is inappropriate because of the total number of firearm transactions, significant improvements made by the licensee since their previous inspection, and the licensee's ability to immediately correct the violation that would result in a warning conference.
There were four repeat violation from a previous inspection in 2014 which resulted in a warning conference. One of the repeat violations warrants a warning conference. However, the licensee had made significant improvements since the last inspection and he was able to quickly correct the violation that warranted the warning conference during the inspection. The DIO concurs with the recommendation of warning letter, however, he is recommendaing that a recall inspection be conducted to ensure future compliance.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 4 violations.
|1||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|2||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »