Remus, Creighton, L.
Remus Firearms
Warning letter Revocation warrantedThis gun dealer was cited for 3 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
Address
1975 210 Rd
Glen Elder, KS 67446
Mitchell County
License
Number | 5-48-123-01-8L-01376 |
Type | Dealer in firearms |
Expiry | Nov 1, 2021 |
Inspection Timeline
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 35.5 hours conducting this inspection. 135 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Compliance. Kansas Priority 3.
Violation #3 - Knowingly engaging in a straw purchase transaction, redacted instances meets the criteria for Revocation according to the current Adverse Action Policy. Basis for ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION : This licensee has been in business since 2006. This is his first compliance inspection since receiving his license. He is a low-volume (approx 25 transfers per year) dealer with no trace history. He conducts primarily special orders for customers he knows personally. The individual to whom the firearms were transferred stated his purpose for purchasing the firearms was so that the licensee did not "get stuck" with the special order firearms. Licensee believes this individual is still in possession of the firearms he purchased. Further, the individual who had received the "denied" status via the NICS does not appear to have any Federal prohibitors for firearms. Denial was based on a "Fugitive from Justice" due to a traffic infraction warrant. Licensee was receptive to suggestions for improving internal controls, was cooperative during the inspection, and was sincerely remorseful when he realized the seriousness of a possible straw purchase. Based on these facts, an alternate recommendation of a Warning Conference/Warning Letter with Recall Inspection is submitted. FLS updates needed •Change primary phone to: 785-346-300 •Change emergency phone to: redacted •Change e-mail address to: redacted
ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION : WARNING LETTER - RECALL The inspection meets the standard for Revocation under the Administrative Action Policy (2/8/2013). The licensee was cited for Violaiton-3 - failing to prevent the straw purchase in redacted instances - Revocation at Sec 6.(4)(e). Additional violations include Violation-2 - failure to ensure transferees complete Section A certification on redacted Forms 4473 (100% error rate) - W C at Sec6.d.(3); and Violation-1 - failure to accurately record acquisition information in the A&D record redacted instances at 8%) - WL at Sec 6.c.(1).
Concur with alternate for warning letter.
Violations
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 3 violations.
Citation | Description | |
---|---|---|
478.125(e) | Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗 | |
478.21(a) | Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗 | |
478.128(c) | False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗 |
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »