Rocky Range Arms LLCWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun manufacturer was cited for 8 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
|Type||Manufacturer of firearms|
|Expiry||Dec 1, 2023|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 126.5 hours conducting this inspection. 233 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Conduct a full inspection of this manufacturer. redacted
Inspection concluded on 5/9/16 disclosing eight violations. The straw purchase could warrant Revocation. The disposition errors and marking violations could warrant a Warning Conference. This was the first inspection of the licensee. The straw purchase involved redacted redacted with neither proh bited from possessing firearms. Because of this, an alternate recommendation for a DIO -led WC is suitable 8/3/16. The DIO-WC was conducted on 8/3/16 with a follow-up WL sent on 8/13/16. A recall inspection will be conducted in a year.
SEE Pll DATED 7/15/16 MDWREN
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 8 violations.
|1||478.123(a)||Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of firearms manufactured or acquired. 🔗|
|2||479.102(a)(2)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer of NFA firearms to mark frames or receivers with information including the model, caliber, and the manufacturer and/or importer's name and location. 🔗|
|3||478.92(a)(1)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with required information. 🔗|
|4||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|6||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|7||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|8||478.128(c)||False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »