Saar Corporation

Revocation/denial of renewal

This gun manufacturer was cited for 11 violations. The inspection resulted in revocation/denial of renewal.

A final disposition of revocation/denial of renewal means that ATF officials concluded the dealer must lose its license. This requires a determination that the licensee wilfully violated regulations or is otherwise ineligible to remain in business. The licensee will either have their license revoked after a specified period of time, or be unable to renew their license once it expires.

ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.


81 Spring Lane
Farmington, CT 06032
Hartford County


Number 6-06-003-07-6D-01952
Type Manufacturer of firearms
Expiry License inactive

Inspection Timeline

Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.

This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.

Officers spent a total of 497 hours conducting this inspection. 379 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of revocation/denial of renewal.

Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.

Oct 21, 2015
Inspection assigned
Feb 21, 2017
Officer's recommendation Submitted by Industry Operations Investigator
Revocation/denial of renewal
Nov 3, 2016
Review Signed by Area Supervisor
Revocation/denial of renewal
Nov 3, 2016
Final review Signed by KEHOUCHENS – Director, Industry Operations
Revocation/denial of renewal

I agree with issuance of Notices of Denial and Revocation.

Nov 3, 2016
Warning letter sent


If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.

This licensee was cited for 11 violations.

1 478.123(a) Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of firearms manufactured or acquired. 🔗
2 478.123(b) Failure by a manufacturer to maintain an accurate record of dispositions to other licensees. 🔗
3 478.92(a)(1)(i) Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with serial numbers. 🔗
4 478.92(a)(1)(ii) Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark the frame, receiver, or barrel with information including the model, caliber, and the manufacturer and/or importer's name and location. 🔗
5 478.92(a)(1) Failure by a manufacturer or importer to mark frames or receivers with required information. 🔗
6 478.39a Failure to appropriately report the theft or loss of a firearm from a licensee's inventory. 🔗
7 478.22(c) t 🔗
8 478.36(a) Improperly transferring or possessing a machine gun. 🔗
9 479.61 🔗
10 479.103 Failure to properly file a Notice of Firearms Manufactured or Imported no later than the close of the next business day after the firearms were manufactured. 🔗
11 18 USC 1001 Willfully making false or fraudulent statements regarding any matter within the jurisdiction of the federal government. 🔗

Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »