Sackrider, Mark Leon
Sackys Firearms SalesWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun dealer was cited for 6 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||May 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 632.5 hours conducting this inspection. 106 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Please conduct a full scope ( DE ) firearms compliance inspection of this Type 01 FFL . Please ensure compliance with State & Local laws and ordinances. Note: To ensure travel efficiency, inspections within/near the same vicinity should be coordinated together, during the same time period.
A compliance inspection conducted October 6 through 8, 2015, disclosed six (6) violations of the Gun Control Act , resulting in a recommendation of revocation of FFL for Mark Sackrider, d/b/a Sacky's Firearms Sales.
AS redacted concurs with the recommendation of revocation as a result of the violations cited during the compliance inspection conducted October 6 through 8, 2015.
Despite FFL admission to falsification of date entry on Form 4473 to give appearance of meeting State mandated waiting period, and admission to instructing purchaser to falsify date entry as well, recommendation for DIO held Warning Conference is being made. This case has been thoroughly discussed with Division Counsel, ACC, and SAC. The falsification of date entry on the 4473 did not result in concealing a violation of State Law. Case is being forwarded to FMS ISB for consideration as an alternate recommendation to revocation.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 6 violations.
|1||478.128(c)||False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗|
|2||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|3||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|4||478.100(a)(1)||Conducting business away from the licensed premises. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|6||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »