Sanchez, Eligto V.
Range OneWarning conference
This gun manufacturer was cited for 2 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
|Type||Manufacturer of firearms|
|Expiry||Apr 1, 2024|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 30 hours conducting this inspection. 96 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Conduct a full-scope compliance inspection. Ensure compliance with recordkeeping, reporting, and marking.
Recommendation is ILO Warning Conference Violation one warrants a Warning Conference as the licensee failed to mark redacted with his name, city, and state as the manufacturer. Mr. Sanchez built redacted from prefabricated parts and they were in inventory at the time of inspection. redacted During the inspection, IOI redacted thoroughly explained marking requirements and reporting requirements relating to the Annual Manufacturing and Exportation Report as well as redacted. Mr. Sanchez is now aware of the reporting requirements and time-frames with which to report firearms manufactured. IOI redacted verified on 11/29/16 at the closing conference that redacted had been faxed (confirmation received) and visually inspected the two rifles, ensuring Mr. Sanchez’s name, city and state were documented on the firearms. No manufacture and/or sale of manufactured GCA rifles occurred since commencement of business and therefore there are no “Range One" rifles in interstate commerce without proper markings.
Due to the severity of the violations and the fact that the licensee had redacted on his premises, the DIO recommends a warning conference. Please ensure that the licensee is aware redacted requirement be completed not later than the close of the next business day after manufacturing redacted.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 2 violations.
|1||479.102(a)(2)||Failure by a manufacturer or importer of NFA firearms to mark frames or receivers with information including the model, caliber, and the manufacturer and/or importer's name and location. 🔗|
|2||479.103||Failure to properly file a Notice of Firearms Manufactured or Imported no later than the close of the next business day after the firearms were manufactured. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »