TD Pro Tech Inc
Guns R USWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun dealer was cited for 8 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Feb 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 125 hours conducting this inspection. 278 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
CONDUCT FULL RECALL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION. DIO WC ILO REVOCATION HELD IN JUNE 2014. LICENSEE HAS SHORT TIME TO CRIME TRACE HISTORY (4 MONTHS AVERAGE FredactedCES). SEE MEDFORD PD REPORT REFERENCING LACK OF COOPERATION BY LICENSEE TO PD INVESTIGATION.
On 10/26/2015, Industry Operations Investigator redacted met with Jonathan Purtzer, President of TD Pro Tech Inc. d/b/a Guns R Us, at the licensed premises, located at 259 E. Barnett Road, Suite J, Medford, Oregon 97501, to conduct a Full Recall firearms compliance inspection. The Recall inspection was initiated due to a prior compliance inspection resulting in a Director Industry Operations ( DIO ) Warning Conference in lieu of Revocation. TD Pro Tech Inc. (hereafter referenced as licensee) holds a Type 01 Dealer of Firearms Federal Firearms License ( FFL ). Investigator redacted identified himself as a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Investigator and presented his credentials. Mr. Purtzer provided redacted as identification. Investigator redacted issued a Report of Violations. Investigator redacted recommends revocation of the licensee’s FFL due to all violations disclosed during the inspection were repeat violations from a prior compliance inspection which resulted in a DIO Warning Conference . Licensee was cited for the following: •27 CFR 478.21(a) - Forms Prescribed. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.124(c)(1) - Firearms Transaction Record. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.124(c)(3)(i) - Firearms Transaction Record. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.124(c)(3)(iv) - Firearms Transaction Record. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.124(c)(5) - Firearms Transaction Record. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.102(a) - NICS Background Check. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.125(e) - Firearms Receipt and Disposition by Dealers. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. •27 CFR 478.126a - Reporting Multiple Sales or Other Disposition of Pistols and Revolvers. Repeat violation cited on 04/15/2014. Please see Inspection Portfolio and Exhibits for further information.
Current inspection is a recall from a DIO Warning Conference conducted on 6/2/14 (delegated by the DIO to the A/S ). Current inspection disclosed multiple repeat violations, including a repeat violation which warrants a Warning Conference - the failure to conduct a NICS background check prior to the transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee. A/S concurs with IOI recommendation of Revocation since the licensee has previously been the subject of a DIO Warning Conference within the last two years and the current recall inspection warrants a Warning Conference for a similar, repeated violation. As documented in the narrative report, the licensee's owner/ Responsible Person Jonathan Purtzer is unlikely to be brought into voluntary compliance as demonstrated by his confrontational attitude towards law enforcement. Furthermore, after the onsite inspection was completed it was disclosed that Mr. Purtzer submitted a fraudulent law letter to obtain a 922(o) restricted machine gun. That machine gun was seized by ATF CE and the case is being reviewed for potential criminal prosecution. Recommendation for revocation forwarded to DIO on this date. UPDATED Recommendation 1/11/17 On 12/8/16 a change in control of the licensee occurred. Respons ble Person Alexander Neuman purchased all shares in the corporate entity from Jonathan Purtzer. Mr. Purtzer was the sole Respons ble Person on the license at the time of the inspection and the subsequent submission of the fraudulent law letter to obtain a 922(o) restricted machine gun. On 3/4/16 Mr. Neuman was added as a Responsible Person after purchasing a minority stake. On 12/30/16 the FFLC updated FLS to reflect the deactivation of Mr. Purzer as a Responsible Person, following receipt of a notification letter that confirmed Mr. Purtzer is no longer affiliated with the licensee. In consideration of the change in control and the fact that the repeat violation that the pending revocation is based on occurred prior to Mr. Neuman's addition as a Responsible Person, A/S redacted recommends an alternate administrative action of DIO Warning Conference.
**1/11/17 Change Recommendation to DIO Warning Conference 7/8/16 Concur with recommendation of Revocation. Licensee has previously been the subject of a DIO Warning Conference within the last two years and the current recall inspection warrants a Warning Conference for a similar, repeated violation. Licensee is unlikely to be brought into voluntary compliance as demonstrated by his inspection history and confrontational attitude towards law enforcement.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 8 violations.
|1||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(3)(i)||Failure to obtain identification from a transferee or document it on Form 4473. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|6||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|7||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|8||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »