Wild Goose Sports IncWarning conference Revocation warranted
This gun dealer was cited for 10 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning conference.
A warning conference is held when a licensee has significant or repeat violations. During the conference, an area supervisor offers the licensee specific guidance on how to achieve compliance.
The licensee was found eligible for revocation. The majority of licensees whose violations merit revocation under ATF guidelines ultimately receive a lesser penalty from an ATF director of industry operations.
ATF data indicates that this license is no longer active.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 137 hours conducting this inspection. 267 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning conference.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
I concur with the Investigator's reccommendation of Revocation based on the preponderance of repeat violations cited over multiple past inspections, the fact that a ATF F 4473 was falsified in an attempt to decieve the Investigator with regard to reconciliation of firearms unaccounted for, and the fact that the licensee has had two WC 's and a WL issued over the past ten years.
The inspection disclosed numerous violations, including (among others) failure to timely or accurately record the receipt and/or disposition of a firearms redacted failure to properly execute ATF Forms 4473 and conduct background checks, and altering an ATF Form 4473 and falsely documenting in the A&D record the transfer of four firearms (returned to consignee). Consideration is warranted for revocation based on the facts surrounding a particular transaction redacted firearms and the subsequent actions of the licensee and his employees (falsification of a 4473 and the A&D record for the return of these firearms to a consignee). However potentially insufficient evidence supporting these violations warrants the DIO Warning Conference .
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 10 violations.
|1||478.50||Conducting business at a location away from the licensed premises. 🔗|
|2||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|3||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|5||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|6||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|7||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
|8||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|9||478.124(a)||Failure to record the transfer of a firearm on a Form 4473. 🔗|
|10||478.128(c)||False statement or representation by a licensee regarding any information or records required by the Gun Control Act. This carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »