Wiliam D. Hober, Inc.
Swift Bullet Co.Warning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 6 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Apr 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 40 hours conducting this inspection. 100 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Conduct in conjunction with 779025-2016-0118.
Alternate Recommendation : According to the Adverse Action Policy, the recommendation for this inspection would have included a warning letter for this licensee. However, based on the fact that licensee rarely sells to the general public, has zero trace history, primarily acquires and transfers firearms to himself for sporting and testing purposes, further, licensed premise is located more than 7 hours away from the Area Office, an alternate recommendation of Violations/ ROV Only/No Recall has been submitted for this compliance inspection.
ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION : WARNING LETTER - NO RECALL The inspection meets the standard for Warning Conference under the Adverse Action Policy. The licensee see was cited for redacted A&D disposition discrepancies, equating to a 94% error rate ( WC at Sec 6.d.(2)). Additional violations included failure to complete an F 4472 and conduct a NICS check in redacted instances to a non-prohibited responsible person ( WL at Sec 6.c.(12) & (13); failure to complete a multiple handgun sales report in redacted instance (WL at Sec 6.c.(7); and redacted additional form errors not rising to the level of adverse action. JUSTIFICATION FOR ALTERNATE. This is the licensee’s first inspection. The licensee is primarily a manufacturer of ammunition, holding an additional Type-08 and Type-06 FFL Only a limited number of firearms transactions occur that do not involve persons not related to the business As such, each of the A&D errors involved the missing address of the primary responsible person. Similarly, the licensee's failure to complete F4473s and NICS checks involved the same responsible person. The license had only|jj|| firearms in inventory and ^8 forms on file. There were no traces or theft/loss reports filed for the previous 12 months The licensee's Type-01 license will continue to be inspeaed on a 5-year cycle with its Type-08 importer's license. AS Review: 2/18/2016. Sent to DIO : 2/18/2016 DIO Concurs/WL Sent: 2/18/2016 Pll sent 2/18/2016
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 6 violations.
|1||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
|2||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|4||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|5||478.124(a)||Failure to record the transfer of a firearm on a Form 4473. 🔗|
|6||478.126a||Failure to report the sale of two or more pistols or revolvers to an individual during five consecutive business days. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »