Woods, Robert MWarning letter
This gun dealer was cited for 7 violations. The inspection resulted in a warning letter.
A warning letter is the least severe action the ATF can take against a licensee with compliance issues. The letter advises the licensee to comply with regulations.
|Type||Dealer in firearms|
|Expiry||Jun 1, 2022|
Compliance inspections are conducted by one or more ATF officers. After the lead investigator submits a recommendation, one or more ATF supervisors will review the inspection and either concur with or adjust the recommendation.
This page contains information about a single inspection conducted between 2015 and 2017. The ATF may have inspected this licensee before and/or after the inspection detailed here.
Officers spent a total of 26 hours conducting this inspection. 64 days passed between the assignment and the final review. The licensee received a final outcome of warning letter.
Hover over underlined text to see definitions of common terms.
Please conduct a full scope firearms compliance inspection of this Type 01 FFL . During initial review of this assignment please ensure the shared drive is reviewed for any additional variance approvals, correspondences, etc. that are not located in the file. Zoning - Please utilize the Shared Zoning Folder for all zoning information. If a location needs added, deleted or amended/updated, please do so to ensure we maintain an accurate and up to date database.
IOI redacted issued a Report of Violations ( ROV ) with 7 citations. The inspection resulted in citations related to recordkeeping, conduct of business and administrative issues. The citations warrant a recommendation of a Warning Conference due to the failure to conduct a background check on a transaction. The licensee had conducted a background check on the transferee on a previous transaction and believed that one (1) background check could suffice for the two (2) transactions due to the dates of the transactions occurring relatively closely. As a result of the inventory reconciliation, there were no missing firearms from inventory. IOI redacted found no indications of trafficking. There were no traces during the inspection period. This inspection represents the licensee’s first compliance inspection since 1996. Therefore, IOI redacted recommends an alternate action of ROV, Warning Letter and no Recall Inspection . Also, IOI redacted is requesting a Special Attention Flag be placed in FLS to note that this license should not be renewed without confirmation that the Village of Arlington Heights will permit such a business at the premises. IOI redacted issued a ROV with 7 citations: 1. 27 CFR 478.124(c)(1) 2. 27 CFR 478.124(c)(3)(iv) 3. 27 CFR 478.124(c)(4) 4. 27 CFR 478.124(c)(5) 5. 27 CFR 478.21(a) 6. 27 CFR 478.102(a) 7. 27 CFR 478.125(e)
Concur with IOI redacted recommendation of a Warning Letter only and no recall in lieu of a Warning Conference. though a Warning Conference could be recommended because the FFL failed to conduct a new NICS check on a repeat customer in one instance A/S redacted is recommending only a Warning Letter due to the fact that this is the compliance inspection of the FFL since 1996, limited business conducted by the FFL and no traces during the inspection period. With DIO concurrence the Warning Letter was signed by A/S redacted and mailed on 12/21/15.
DIO concurs with recommendation for warning letter. The licensee has not been inspected in 19 years. Furthermore, the violation in question is failure to conduct a separate backgroudn check for a transaction, after having conducted a recent check for a separate transaction. The FFL believed the recent transaction sufficed for the second transaction. Furthermroe, the IOI conducted a check on the individual, and no prohibiting informatn was found.
If an inspection uncovers regulatory violations, the licensee receives a report outlining these violations. This section lists the violations found in the inspection, as well as a general description of each offense. More details on the nature of the licensee's specific violations may be found in the report PDF.
This licensee was cited for 7 violations.
|1||478.124(c)(1)||Failure to obtain a Form 4473 showing the transferee's name, sex, address, date and place of birth, and other required information. 🔗|
|2||478.124(c)(3)(iv)||Failure to record the date NICS was contacted and the NICS response on Form 4473. 🔗|
|3||478.124(c)(4)||Failure to record on Form 4473 the manufacturer, importer, type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of the firearm being transferred. 🔗|
|4||478.124(c)(5)||Failure of the licensee to sign or date a Form 4473. 🔗|
|5||478.21(a)||Failure to provide all of the information called for in required forms. 🔗|
|6||478.102(a)||Failure to conduct or complete a NICS check before transferring a firearm. 🔗|
|7||478.125(e)||Failure by a dealer to properly maintain a record of the receipt and disposition of firearms. 🔗|
Source: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. About the data »